Court dismissed the current revision petition on the ground that it became infructuous because the main rent control case was disposed of by the trial court. Order costs not directed.
C.R.P. dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
C.R.P.No. 4652 of 1997.
ORDER:
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the main Rent Control Case itself is disposed of by the trial court, the revision petition became infructuous. In view of the submission, the C.R.P. is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ R.KANTHA RAO, J 28.12.2011. KRB.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
C.R.P.No. 4652 of 1997.
ORDER:
Dt. 28.12.2011.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition became infructuous due to the disposal of the main rent control case.
Petitioner
Respondent
R.KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
