Petitioner assailed a Section 148 notice. Court found first respondent passed a nil final assessment under Section 147/143 during pendency. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.28512 OF 2009
Date:04.02.2011
Between: Mahanadi Bio-tech Private Limited, Regd. Office at H.No.2-13/31, SS Nagar, Opp: Hyder Nagar, Hyderabad, represented by its Director Smt. B.Nandini Raju .. Petitioner And Income Tax Officer (OSD)-2, Central Circle-I, 7th Floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad and another .. Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.28512 OF 2009
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
This writ petition is filed assailing the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
It is now brought to the notice of this Court that during the pendency of this writ petition, the first respondent passed final assessment order under Section 147 read with Section 143 of the Act, and since the assessment is nil, nothing survives in the writ petition.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J)
_____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
04.02.2011
KH
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahanadi Bio-tech Private Limited
Income Tax Officer | OSD 2, Central Circle 1
V.V.S. Rao
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
