The respondent withdrew the appeal. Permission was granted and the Central Excise Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.14 of 2011
Dated:02.02.2011
Between:
The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad-III Commissionerate, L.B.Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
…Petitioner
and M/s.Rafiq Brothers.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.14 of 2011
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
The Senior Standing Counsel for Customs & Central Excise submits that in view of the subsequent orders passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Department wants to withdraw this matter.
Permission is accorded, and the Central Excise Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
_______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
_____________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
02.02.2011
vs
The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad-III Commissionerate
M/s.Rafiq Brothers
V.V.S.Rao
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
