S.Rohit So of S.Manohar Rao v. J.N.T.U
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions were dismissed as they had become infructuous during the pendency of the proceedings before the court.
Writ petitions were dismissed as they had become infructuous during the pendency of the proceedings before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
W.P.No.25828 of 2009
AND
W.P.No.25829 of 2009
COMMON ORDER:
Sri P. Sridhar Reddy, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that both these Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
_____________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J) 17.03.2011
P. Sridhar Reddy
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court