Power (IA) Department, dated 22.01.1985. Thereafter, an Award No.Rc.44/82 RI-1, dated 22.04.1988, was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam. In respect of the petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac. 0.12 cents in Sy.No.84/6, Ac. 0.07 cents in Sy.No.84/9A, the names of Sri Miskin, S/o. Shaik Moula, Khasim, along with the father of the petitioner, have been shown as owner/occupier of the land in D.D. under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Therefore, all the three have right in the said land, in respect of which notices under Sections 9(3) and 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, have been issued. Similarly, in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.39 cents and Ac. 0.09 cents in Sy.Nos.84/10A and 84/10B, which have been mentioned under the declaration issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the name of the petitioner’s father was also mentioned as owner/occupier. He submits that in the said Award, it was mentioned that the required award amount was deposited in the civil Court under Section 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in respect of the said land on the ground that there was no claim petition. He further submits that Nammi Venkanna @ Kittayya is the owner of the land. As there was no representation, the money was deposited in the civil Court, which is noticed by the petitioner at the later stage, about which earlier he had no knowledge and the father of the petitioner had substantial right over the land to extent referred to in the award proceedings. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation, dated 14.12.2012, to the Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Revenue Division, Visakhapatnam, narrating all the facts and circumstances and requested to refer the matter under Sections 30 and 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for proper adjudication so as to enable
