No.10260 of 2007 was dismissed for default as the petitioner's counsel was absent with no representation on behalf. No order as to costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.10260 of 2007
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, neither the learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor there is any representation on his behalf.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
03rd December 2011 DR
Petitioners
R.SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
