Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous because the learned Advocate-Commissioner executed the warrant and filed a report.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No :4461 of 2010
DATED:19-01-2011
Between: Karna Ramamohana Rao.
..... PETITIONER
And
Boddu Ratnamba & 3 others.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondents states that the Civil Revision Petition has since become infructuous as the learned Advocate-Commissioner, appointed by the trial Court, has already executed the warrant and filed his report on 07-10-2010.
In view of the said representation, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J
19th January, 2011. Tsy
Karna Ramamohana Rao
Boddu Ratnamba & 3 others
G.V. Seethapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
