7. According to the plaintiff, subsequent to filing of the suit, the defendants have effected certain alterations to the disputed property. The plaintiff is certainly entitled to seek necessary relief in that regard based on the cause of action that has arisen subsequent to filing of the suit. Initially, the plaintiff sought for permanent injunction claiming that he was in possession. By way of proposed amendment, he is seeking additional relief of mandatory injunction in respect of certain structures and constructions, which according to the plaintiff are illegal, they having been effected subsequent to filing of the suit. The plaintiff is certainly entitled to claim the said relief of mandatory injunction. The question whether or not the plaintiff is entitled for the said relief is a different aspect altogether and the same has to be decided after necessary evidence adduced in the course of trial. The proposed amendment seeking additional relief of mandatory injunction does not in any way change the cause of action or alter the nature, nor does it cause any prejudice to the defendants. The plaintiff shall however, value the said additional relief of mandatory injunction separately and pay separate Court fee thereon as the said relief is distinct and separate, but not consequential to the original relief of permanent injunction. In the circumstances, it is held that subject to the above direction, regarding the payment of separate Court fee, the impugned
