PWs.4 and 5 speak to an incident which took place about 15 days prior to the deceased committing suicide. It is their evidence that on petty disputes there was quarrel between the accused and the deceased and the accused beat the deceased causing bleeding injuries to her, when the deceased left house of the accused and went to PW5. According to PW-5, she got the deceased treated by a Doctor for her injury and sent her back on the previous day of the suicide and questioned the accused about his highhanded behaviour against the deceased. The entire above episode spoken by PWs.4 and 5 in their evidence during trial in the lower Court, is a development during trial without any basis in the investigation record i.e., statements of them recorded by PW-12 under Section 161 (3) Cr.P.C. PW-4 admitted in the cross-examination that she did not disclose the said incident to the police during investigation when her statement was recorded. Even though PW-5 denied about she not disclosing that episode to the police, it was elicited in cross-examination of PW-12 that PW-5 did not state to him in her statement about the above facts. Thus, entire crucial evidence of PWs.4 and 5 against the accused is an after thought and
