The bench held that multiple Company Appeals had become infructuous in the absence of further details and dismissed them as such.
All Company Appeals (nos. 11, 12, 13 of 2010 and 15, 16 of 2011) dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN COMPANY APPEAL NO.11 OF 2010 COMPANY APPEAL NO.12 OF 2010 COMPANY APPEAL NO.13 OF 2010 COMPANY APPEAL NO.15 OF 2011 COMPANY APPEAL NO.16 OF 2011
COMMON ORDER:
Ms. Madhavi Priya Mantena, Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the Appeal Nos.11, 12, 13 of 2010 and 15 and 16 of 2011 have become infructuous. The Company Appeals are dismissed as such.
Date: 23.01.2012 ____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J MRKR
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
