3. The appeal is filed against the order in W.C.No.57 of 1998 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nizamabad, questioning the compensation of Rs.1,12,309/- for the injuries said to have been caused to the 1st respondent, who was a clear engaged on the Tipper bearing No. APH 7959 on 03.11.1997. According to the case of the claimant, the driver of the tipper drove the tipper in a rash and negligent manner, as a result of which, it turned turtle and the claimant received multiple injuries. The claimant pleaded that he suffered grievous injuries and spent money for medial examination. The appellant herein, who is the 1st respondent, disputed the liability and also the rashness and negligence attributed to the driver of the tipper. The 2nd respondent, who is the owner of the tipper, stated that the vehicle was insured with the appellant herein and there is no liability. After considering the material on record, the tribunal granted the compensation taking into consideration the earning capacity of the injured, and his age and also the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act.
