4-7-2002, he submitted his explanation and was placed under suspension by the 3rd respondent-Corporation vide his proceedings dated 27-6-2002. On completion of enquiry, the Enquiry Officer submitted his report stating that the charges levelled against the petitioner are proved. On receipt of enquiry report vide proceedings dated 18-10-2002, the 3rd respondentCorporation called for the objections/comments from the petitioner and the petitioner submitted his objections/comments vide letter dated 22-10-2002. Not satisfying with the explanation given by the petitioner, the 3rd respondent-Corporation issued a show cause notice dated 2-11-2002 to the petitioner proposing penalty of postponing his annual increment for a period of two years with an effect on his future increments besides treating his suspension period as not on duty. In reply to the said show cause notice, the petitioner submitted his explanation on 18-11-2002. Not satisfying with the explanation of the petitioner to show cause notice, the 3rd respondent-Corporation vide his proceedings dated 26-5-2004, issued impugned final order imposing penalty of postponing his annual increment for a period of two years having an effect on his future increments besides treating his suspension period as not on duty. Against the said impugned final order, the petitioner made an appeal to the 2nd respondent-Corporation and the same was rejected as time barred vide his proceedings dated 8-5-2005. Again the petitioner made a review to the 1st respondent-Corporation, but the 1st respondent did not pass any order so far. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.
