availed CGHS in New Delhi vide Token No.P.020708. Owing to his old age and personal family circumstances, he returned to his native place i.e., Hyderabad in order to be nearer to his children for proper care and accordingly, he settled in Hyderabad. Since he shifted from New Delhi to Hyderabad and residing in Hyderabad, he made a representation on 1-11-2006 to the respondent authorities requesting them to extend the CGHS benefits to him at Hyderabad and his request was negatived stating that the CGHS facility will be extended to the persons who are residing in Delhi/New Delhi. In this connection, he made several representations to the authorities concerned by bringing to their notice about various orders passed by this Court observing that the action of the respondent-authorities in denying the benefit of the CGHS to the persons residing out side Delhi as illegal by directing the respondent-authorities to extend the said benefit to the persons residing in out side Delhi also. Similar question arose before this Court in W.P.No.1699 of 1995 and this Court allowed the said writ petition directing the respondent-authorities to extend CGHS facilities to the persons who are residing out side Delhi and the said order was confirmed in W.A.No.618 of 1998. In this view of the matter, the petitioner is also entitled for the CGHS facilities though he is residing in Hyderabad. The respondent-authorities instead of following the judgments of this Court, having extended the benefits to the petitioners in those writ petitions who are residing in Hyderabad, denying to extend the said benefit to him on the ground that there is no order in his favour. Hence, he constrained to file the present writ petition.
