A writ petition filed by P. Anil Kumar against the District Collector and others was dismissed by Justice Sanjay Kumar as infructuous upon counsel's submission. No costs awarded.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.537 of 2001
Between:
P.Anil Kumar
…Petitioner
AND
The District Collector (Chairman) Khammam District and others.
…Respondents
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.537 of 2001
ORDER:
Sri Veera Sekhar Rao, learned counsel, representing Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
March 04, 2010 Bvv
P. Anil Kumar
The District Collector (Chairman) Khammam District and others
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
