Petitioner's counsel submitted the writ petition was infructuous. The single Judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and vacated an interim order without adjudication on substantive issues.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Dated 15-4-2010
WRIT PETITION No: 2843 of 2001
Between:
T. Rama Chandra Reddy.
..... PETITIONER
AND
Government of India, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, 110A, Railway Bhavan, Raisina Road, New Delhi and another. ....RESPONDENTS
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No: 2843 of 2001
ORDER:
Sri A. Rama Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3. The interim order dated 20-2-2001 shall stand
vacated.
___________________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Dated 15-04-2010. Dvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No: 2843 of 2001
Dated 15-4-2010
T. Rama Chandra Reddy
Government of India, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
