The writ petition was ultimately dismissed because the petitioner expressed a desire not to pursue it, resulting in the petition being treated as withdrawn.
The interim order dated 24-08-2009 was dissolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
W.P. No. 16317 of 2009
DATE: 18-06-2010
Between:
Smt. M. Nagarani
….. Petitioner And
Vijaya Bank, West Marredpally Branch, 10-2-42/A & C, L.G. Towner, West Marredpally, Secunderabad and others.
Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
W.P. No. 16317 of 2009
Order: (Per: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM)
Sri D. Madhava Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. The interim order dated 24-08-2009 stands dissolved. No costs.
_____________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM ________________________ JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
Dated: 18-06-2010
PVKS
Smt. M. Nagarani
Vijaya Bank, West Marredpally Branch and others
Goda Raghuram
Noushad Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
