The High Court granted the petitioner's permission to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
W.P.NO. 11274 of 2010
11-06-2010
BETWEEN;
M/s.Ojas Pharmaceuticals, rep. by its Director Mr.Pradeep A. Pershad
...Petitioner
vs.
M/s The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., rep. by its Branch Manager and another
...Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
W.P.NO.11274 of 2010
ORAL ORDER: (Per GR,J)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of thi
Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order a
to costs.
______________
GODA RAGHURAM,J
______________
NOUSHAD ALI,J
11th JUNE 2010
TSNR
M/s.Ojas Pharmaceuticals
M/s The Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
GODA RAGHURAM
NOUSHAD ALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
