Writ petition dismissed for default on the ground of non-appearance of the petitioner and absence of representation on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
Writ Petition No. 4328 of 1995
10-06-2010
Between:
Bhagwan Panjabi
……….Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
………Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI
Writ Petition No. 4328 of 1995
ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
When the matter is taken up for hearing none appears for the
petitioner and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There
shall be no order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Dated: 10-06-2010
JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI KVR
Bhagwan Panjabi
The State of Andhra Pradesh
GODA RAGHURAM
NOUSHAD ALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
