Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Razak Baig, Vs Shaik Mohamood — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2010)

Home
Telangana HC
2010
Razak Baig, Vs Shaik MohamoodRazak Baig, v. Shaik Mohamood

Dismissed

Razak Baig, v. Shaik Mohamood

Telangana HC13 Apr 2010MACMA/751/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal dismissed due to absence of respondent No.1, preventing determination of liability.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

M.A.CMA.No.751 OF 2010

Between:

Razak Baig

.....APPELLANT

AND

Shaik Mohamood and another

....RESPONDENTS

The Court made the following:

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Razak Baig
respondent
Shaik Mohamood
respondent
another

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 13 Apr 2010 · April
Registered: 18 May 2010
Case no.: MACMA/751/2010

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.c.bhanu

Smt. Potti Rajeshwari Vs Quader Mphiuddin
12 Apr 2010
Vardhineni Srinivasulu Vs Kota Krishna Reddy
12 Apr 2010
B. Balaji Rao, Vs M. Vijender Reddy
12 Apr 2010
Gannu Saraswathi , Deva Saraswathi, Vs Deva Kamalamma
13 Apr 2010

Cite this judgement

Razak Baig, v. Shaik Mohamood, MACMA/751/2010 (TEL), decided on 13 April 2010.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.C. Bhanu

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Appeal dismissed for default of respondent No.1 whose absence precluded the Court from deciding liability; accordingly, the maintenance application is dismissed with no order as to costs.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

M.A.CMA.No.751 OF 2010

JUDGMENT:

Claim against respondent No.1 is dismissed. In the absence of respondent No.1, this Court cannot decide or determine the liability. Hence, the appeal also stands dismissed.

Accordingly, the M.A.CMA. is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_______________ K.C. BHANU, J

April 13, 2010 MD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

M.A.CMA.No.34325 OF 2005

April 13, 2010

K.C. Bhanu

CNR

HBHC010363962010

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED

Anjani Chander Vs The Divisional Railway Manager

13 Apr 2010

Changanti Rama Rao Vs The Apsrtc

13 Apr 2010