Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear on the dates of hearing.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 389 of 2006 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.389 OF 2006
Between:
Anjani Chandar
.....APPELLANT
AND
The Divisional Railway Manager and others
....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.389 OF 2006
JUDGMENT:
When the matter had come up on 29.03.2010, none appeared for the appellant, and therefore, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter has come up, none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on his behalf.
Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ K.C. BHANU, J
April 13, 2010 Note: Issue C.C. in three days. B/O.MD
Anjani Chandar
The Divisional Railway Manager
K.C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
