Papireddy Ravindra Reddy v. Nagalapuram Adisesha Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice K.C. Bhanu held that the trial court's interlocutory order attaching garnishee amount without issuing a show-cause notice for security was illegal under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. The order was modified to grant the petitioner two weeks to furnish security.
What did the court decide?
Directed the petitioner to furnish security within two weeks; failing which, the garnishee amount shall be attached.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELVETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5533 OF 2009
Between:
Pappireddy Ravindra Reddy
..... PETITIONER
AND
Nagalapuram Adisesha Reddy
....RESPONDENT
The Court made the following:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whet;heighter attaching garnishee amount was in accordance with Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC, which required issuing a show-cause notice first.
How to modify the impugned order when the trial court failed to issue notice to obtain security.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pappireddy Ravindra Reddy
- respondent
Nagalapuram Adisesha Reddy
Coram
K.C. Bhanu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/5533/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court