Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing on two occasions without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
Dated 27-4-2010.
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4159 OF 2009
Between:
Malepati Tirupathi Reddy.
…Petitioner.
And:
M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd., No.21 Patullos Road, Chennai, having its Branch at 8/1 Arundelpet Guntur represented by its Branch Manager A.Bhaskara Krishna and others.
...Respondents.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4159 OF 2009
ORDER:
On 26-2-2010, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner.
Today also, when the matter is listed for hearing, again there is no representation for the petitioner.
Hence, the C.R.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs.
___________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
Dated 27-4-2010.
Dvs
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4159 OF 2009 Dated 27-4-2010.
Malepati Tirupathi Reddy
M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
