Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. Counsel submitted that petitioners agreed to vacate premises, rendering the revision meaningless.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
Dated 27-4-2010.
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3787 OF 2009
Between:
Kanikicherla Suryaprakasa Rao and others.
…Petitioners.
And:
Gadamsetti Venkateswarlu and others.
...Respondents.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3787 OF 2009
ORDER:
Heard both sides.
Sri Srinivas Emani, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents herein submits that on behalf of the petitioners a letter has been filed before the Court below to the effect that they would vacate the premises by the end of next month and in view of the same, nothing survives in this revision.
2. Recording the said submission, the C.R.P. is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
___________________________ JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
Dated 27-4-2010.
Dvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3787 OF 2009
Dated 27-4-2010.
Kanikicherla Suryaprakasa Rao and others.
Gadamsetti Venkateswarlu and others.
B. Prakash Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
