Shaik Rasool Bee v. Sri P. Janardhana Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FORM-I
NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER ADMISSION (SEE RULE 18) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
: PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: B. PRAKASH RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 635 of 2005
Between:
V. Janardhana Rao, S/o. Chidambara Rao.
. ..... Petitioner
AND
1. Sri G. Raja Rao, Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Circle Office, Guntur District.
2. Sri B.B.S. Chiranjivi, Dy. Executive Engineer (R.R. Division), SubDivision II, Guntur, Guntur District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Janardhana Rao
- respondent
G. Raja Rao
- respondent
B.B.S. Chiranjivi
- respondent
S. Shaukath Hussain
- respondent
Korivi Siva Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/635/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court