G.Papaiah, v. The General Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No : 8459 of 2008
Between:
G.Papaiah, S/o.Yellaiah,
A.P.State Fishermen Co-Operative Societies Federation Ltd R/o.H.No.1072 N.G.Os Colony Vanasthalipuram Hyd-70
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in transferring the petitioner herein in proceedings No.2704/AF.I/06, dt.14-3-2008 which is endorsed by the 2nd respondent herein in Endt.No.MM/AFCOF/08 dt.9-4-2008 from ZoneIV (Telangana Area) to Zone-I(AP) and consequential transfers orders of the petitioner herein as illegal arbitrary.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.GANESWARA RAO NIDUMUKKALA
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MS.M.VIDYAVATHI
The Court made the following O R D E R:
None appears for the writ petitioner even today, though the matter has been adjourned on 2nd June 2009, 9th June 2009 and 16th June 2009 and listed for dismissal today.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
---------------------------------(NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J) 23rd June 2009 ksld
G.Papaiah
A.P.State Fishermen Co-Operative Societies Federation Ltd
NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court