Petitioner withdrew a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging an order of the DRT. Dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO : 6027 of 2009
Between:
Tatineni Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Venkatappaiah, R/o. Model Steels Pvt. Ltd. Pinnamaneni Teacher
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 Andhra Bank, Nidamuru Branch, Vijayawada, Rep by its Branch Manager 2 Deputy General Manager and Authorized Officer, Andhra Bank, Zonal Office, Vijayawada. 3 M/s. Model Steels Pvt. Ltd. D.No. 9/A, 1st Floor, Lenaine Cine Estate, Abid Road, Hyderabad. 4 D.K.D.V. Prasad, S/o. Venu, Budda Nagar, Managing Director, M/s. Model Steels Pvt. Ltd. Gunadala, Vijayawada. 5 The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Rep by Presiding Officer Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the pertaining to the impugned order dated 05-2-209 passed by the Learned DRT, Visakhapatnam in IA No. 446 of 2008 in SA No. 70 of 2005 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently to set aside the same.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent No.: .
The Court made the following :
ORDER: (Per Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah, J.)
Sri V.Srinivasa Rao representing Sri P.Jagadish Chandra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he got instructions to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J.
________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J. 2.4.2009 kpr
Tatineni Bhaskara Rao
Andhra Bank
M/s. Model Steels Pvt. Ltd.
Debt Recovery Tribunal
V.ESWARAIAH
SANJAY KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
