Single judge disposed of the writ petition by dismissing it as infructuous solely because the relevant period had already expired by the time of the order.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.10342 of 2009 Date : 16-12-2009
Between : The Gram Panchayat, Baddipudi village, Ulavalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, Rep. by its Sarpanch Smt.M.Arunamma .. Petitioner And The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA W.P.No.10342 of 2009
ORDER:
It is stated that the period itself is over. In view of the same, the Writ Petition became infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
_________________ Justice P.S.Narayana
Date : 16-12-2009
AM
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed when the period of the underlying service period has elapsed.
The Gram Panchayat, Baddipudi village, Ulavalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, Rep. by its Sarpanch Smt. M. Arunamma
The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Secretary, Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
P.S. Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
