The High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ appeal by the appellant and dismissed the appeal accordingly. No order as to costs was passed.
Permission to withdraw the writ appeal was granted, and the appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO : 885 of 2001
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 25.4.2001 in WP NO : 11548 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
.....
APPELLANT
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:MR.SYED AZIZ UL HAQ
Counsel for the Respondent No.: SMT.G.JYOTHI KIRAN
The Court made the following :
ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari)
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of the court to withdraw the Writ Appeal.
Permission is accorded. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.
____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari
__________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar
June 12, 2009 MAS.
.....
.....
T.Meena Kumari
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
