The High Court of Andhra Pradesh permitted the appellant to withdraw the Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO : 795 of 2009
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 23/07/2007 in WP NO : 27522 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.)
Between: Boyi Venkateswara Rao, s/o Durga Rao, r/at Arundalpet, Vijayawada.
.....
APPELLANT
AND
1 Assistant Commissioner of Labour and Controlling Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Vijayawada. 2 Assistant Labour Officer, VIII Circle, Vijayawada.
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant: MR.AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent No.: .
The Court made the following :
ORAL JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T.Meena Kumari)
Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing for some time, sought permission of the court to withdraw the Writ Appeal.
Permission is accorded. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdraw. No order as to cost.
____________________ Justice T.Meena Kumari
__________________ Justice Sanjay Kumar June 16, 2009 MAS.
Boyi Venkateswara Rao
Assistant Commissioner of Labour
Assistant Labour Officer
T. Meena Kumari
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
