The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition for non-prosecution because the petitioners failed to file proof of service of notice despite prior permission granted on 16.02.2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P. No.3794 of 2008
Between:
Gurram Venkata Surya Prakash Rao and others.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
Uppala Lalitha Devi
.....RESPONDENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3794 of 2008
ORDER:
On 16.02.2009, the petitioners were permitted to take out notice on the respondent and file proof of service. As on this day, proof of service is not filed. It indicates that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the litigation. Hence the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J
Date:26.10.2009 usd
Gurram Venkata Surya Prakash Rao and others
Uppala Lalitha Devi
B.Seshasayana Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
