Bolla China Venkanna v. Dasari Sri Ramulu
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.804 of 2008 was dismissed due to lack of prosecution as no representation appeared for the appellants despite listing for dismissal.
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.804 of 2008 was dismissed due to lack of prosecution as no representation appeared for the appellants despite listing for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.804 of 2008
Between:
Bolla China Venkanna and another.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
Dasari Sri Ramulu and others.
.....RESPONDENTS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.804 of 2008
ORDER:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It indicates that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the litigation. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J
Date:26.10.2009 usd
Bolla China Venkanna and another
Dasari Sri Ramulu and others
B.Sheshasayana Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court