The Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed as the appellant was represented as not interested in pursuing the C.M.A., noting it was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
C.M.A.No.646 of 2009
JUDGMENT:
No representation on behalf of the appellant. It indicates that the appellant is not interested to pursue this C.M.A. Accordingly, the C.M.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J 19.10.2009 Stp
Appellant
B.Seshasayana Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
