The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear and showed no interest in pursuing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.441 of 2002
(Dated : 04-11-2009)
Between:
Steel Authority of India Limited A Government of India Enterprise having its registered office At Integrated Office Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi rep. by Zonal Manager
…Appellant
A n d Union of India represented by the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Calcutta and another
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.441 of 2002
ORDER:
When the appeal came up for consideration, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It indicates that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
_____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY, J
Dt.4-11-2009 RAR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.441 of 2002
(Dated : 04-11-2009)
Steel Authority of India Limited
Union of India
B.Seshasayana Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
