The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the contempt case, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission accorded to withdraw the Contempt Case; the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO :648 of 2009
DATED: 02-11-2009
Between: A.Satyanarayana.
..... PETITIONER
AND
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Rep. by its Vice-Chairman/Managing Director, Begumpet, Hyderabad & 3 others.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive and
therefore seeks permission to withdraw the Contempt Case.
Permission as sought for is accorded. Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
____________________________ B.SESHASAYANA REDDY,J
02nd November, 2009 Tsy
A.Satyanarayana
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority
Managing Director, Begumpet, Hyderabad
2 others
B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
