“In reply to para No.5, it is submitted that the allegation that the officials of the respondents 1 to 3 are acting hand in glove with 4th respondent is totally false. The respondent herein has the highest regards for the directions of this Hon’ble Court. They are duty bound to obey the orders of this Hon’ble Court. Hence, the allegation that the respondent Corporation has violated the orders of this Hon’ble Court is not true. After the application under the B.P.S. filed by the respondent No.4, was rejected, action was initiated as per law and the unauthorized construction made by the respondent No.4, was demolished. Since the B.P.S. Application was pending, the respondent Corporation could not dispose off the representation filed by the petitioner within time. This was neither wanton nor willful but for the reasons stated above. This Respondent offers his unconditional apology for the delay in disposing off the representation of the petitioner. After the action was initiated, the respondent Corporation has addressed a letter to the petitioner about the action taken by the respondent Corporation.”
