The court empowered the appellant to withdraw an appeal suit. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
Dated 16-11-2009
APPEAL SUIT No.667 OF 2007
Between:
Maddina Penchalaiah.
…Appellant.
And:
1. Chithirala Ranganadha Gupta and another.
…Respondents.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
APPEAL SUIT No.667 OF 2007
JUDGMENT:
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
2. Permission as sought for is accorded.
3. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs.
__________________________________ Justice B. SESHASAYANA REDDY Date: 16-11-2009. Dvs
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
APPEAL SUIT No.667 OF 2007
Dated 16-11-2009
Maddina Penchalaiah
Chithirala Ranganadha Gupta and another
B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
