G.Rajasekhar, v. The Tobacco Board.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the writ petition was infructuous and disposed of the matter by dismissing it without granting any relief.
The High Court held that the writ petition was infructuous and disposed of the matter by dismissing it without granting any relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND ANDEIGHT.
P R E S E N T
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No. 9900 of 2005
Between:
G.Rajasekhar … Petitioner
Versus
The Tobacco Board by its Secretary Guntur, Guntur District & Anr. … Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. PRABHAKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI C.V. MOHAN REDDY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO. 9900 OF 2005
ORDER:
It is stated that the writ petition became infructuous. The same is hereby recorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
JUSTICE P . S . NARAYANA .
17 /1/2008.
IsL
G. Rajasekhar
The Tobacco Board
P.S. Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court