This interim order dispenses with adjudication on merits due to a prior stay. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders within three months.
Petitioner directed to proceed with enquiry and pass appropriate orders within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.32394 of 1997
Dated 15th February 2007
Between:
Kanchustambam Venkateswara Rao, Pusuvula Lanka, I.Polavaram Mandalm, E.G. District.
………Petitioner
and
The Mandal Revenue Officer, I.Polavaram Mandal, I.Polavaram, E.G. District and others..
………..Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No.32394 of 1997
ORDER:
In view of the interim order dated 18-12-1997 no further adjudication is necessary on merits.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to proceed with the enquiry and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, if not already passed, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.
________________
(G.ROHINI, J) Dated: 15th February 2007 mrb
Kanchustambam Venkateswara Rao
The Mandal Revenue Officer
G.Rohini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
