M.Kanaka Chandram v. Prohibiton and Excise Inspector
Case brief
What is this about?
The court addressed a dispute where the petitioner was booked for transporting liquor under the Excise Act but claimed the conduct fell under the Prohibition Act, making the offence compoundable. The court directed the Deputy Commissioner to treat it as a section 8 offence and consider the compoundation application.
What did the court decide?
Directed second respondent to consider petitioner's application of 15-03-2007 to compound the offence treating it under Section 8 of Prohibition Act.
What the court decided
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.31113 of 1997
Date: 21-03-2007
Between:
M. Kanaka Chandram
Petitioner
And
The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Jangaon,
Warangal District and others
Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.31113 of 1997
ORDER:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the conduct of the petitioner covered under Section 8 of the Prohibition Act should be treated as a compoundable offence instead of being booked under Section 34 of the Excise Act.
Whether the second respondent is directed to consider the application to compound the offence treated under the Prohibition Act.
Whether the exemption of the petitioner to be tried under a less rigorous provision of the Prohibition Act applies.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Kanaka Chandram
- respondent
The Prohibition & Excise Inspector, Jangaon, Warangal District
- respondent
Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Warangal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/31113/1997
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court