The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel stated that the cause of action no longer survived.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.2453 of 1998 Date: 15-03-2007
Between: Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C.,Gannavaram, Krishna District.
Petitioner And
N. Laxmayya and another.
Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P.No.2453 of 1998
ORDER:
Sri R.Manmadha Reddy, the learned counsel for the writ petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any longer and it has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
__________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO,J 15-03-2007 Stp
Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Gannavaram
N. Laxmayya
Nooty Ramamohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
