The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw W.P.No.25786 of 2003 upon filing an affidavit stating the sale of the subject factory. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
W.P.No.25786 of 2003
Dated: 1 1 th day of October, 2007
Between: Chinni Rajagopal .. Petitioner and The Superintending Engineer, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Nellore and three others .. Respondents
O R D E R:
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an affidavit of the petitioner stating that the petitioner sold away Chinni Ice Factory to Sri Grandhi Raj Gopal by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 7.2.2007, Doc.No.2148/2007, and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
_______________ 11.10.2007 Note: Furnish copy by tomorrow B/o bcj
Chinni Rajagopal
The Superintending Engineer, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Nellore and three others
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
