Apsrtc Kakinada v. Stat Hyd and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT…
SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA WRIT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION No.16539 of 1997
Dated: 11.10.2007
Between:
Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Kakinada.
.. Petitioner
And The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep. by its Presiding Officer, A.P., Hyderabad, and others.
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
WRIT PETITION No.16539 of 1997
ORDER:
Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC, represented that the writ petition has become infructuous.
The submission is recorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
_________________________ (GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J)
Dt.11.10.2007 v v
Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Kakinada
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court