Petitioner submitted that respondents rejected his case after interim court direction, causing the writ petition to cease to survive. Court dismissed the petition without costs.
Writ petition dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH
RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 22222 OF 1997
Date: 06.02.2007
Between:
M. Rama Moorthy.
… Petitioner.
And
The Secretary to Govt. Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept, Govt. of A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others.
… Respondents.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 22222 OF 1997
ORDER:
Petitioner would submit that pursuant to the interim orders of this Court directing that the petitioner’s case be considered, respondents had considered his case and had rejected it. Learned Counsel would fairly submit that in view there of the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs.
____________________________ Date: 07.02.2007 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
M. Rama Moorthy
Secretary to Govt. Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Dept, Govt. of A.P.
three others
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
