The single-judge court referred to a Supreme Court judgment regarding worker remedies. Standing open to the petitioners to avail such remedies, the court dismissed the writ petition without costs.
Writ petition dismissed; counsel for the petitioner left to avail available remedies; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH
RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 22054 OF 1997
Date: 07.02.2007
Between:
N. Kishsore and three others.
Petitioners.
And
The A.P. State Electricity Board, Vidyut Soudha, Sopmajiguda, Hyderabad and two others.
…
Respondents.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 22054 OF 1997
ORDER:
Sri Dhonday Ram Mane, learned Counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Steel Authority of India Ltd Vs. National Union Water Front [1] Workers the petitioner be permitted to avail such remedies as are available to them in law. Leaving it open to the petitioners, if they so choose to avail such remedies as are available to them, the writ petition is dismissed. However, in the circumstances, without costs.
____________________________ Date: 07.02.2007 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
MRKR
[1] AIR 2001 SC 3527
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to avail specific legal remedies available to them under law.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Steel Authority of India Ltd Vs. National Union Water FrontReferred¶15
AIR 2001 SC 3527 · Who else cites this
N. Kishsore and three others
The A.P. State Electricity Board and two others
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
