The petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the subject matter was no longer live. No costs were awarded to the respondent.
None. Costs to respondent were not awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.17627 of 2001
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND SEVEN
Between:
M. Chakravarthy, S.o. late M. Satyanarayana, Aged 18 years, Student, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle and R/o. SLN Poultries, Raigiri, Bhongir, Nalgonda.
… Petitioner
And
The Secretary to Govt. Technical Education, Higher Education (EC) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.
… Respondents
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY.
April 19, 2007 MRR
M. Chakravarthy
The Secretary to Govt. Technical Education, Higher Education (EC) Department
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
