The petitioner is the management and first respondent is workman. It appears, first respondent-workman was terminated from service on 12.9.1987. According to the petitioner, a farce of an enquiry was conducted and the management was enemically disposed towards him in view of the fact that earlier he filed I.D.No.1 of 1982 before the Labour Court, in which, the management was directed to reinstate the workman with full backwages and other attendant benefits. Aggrieved by the same, management filed W.P.No.7630 of 1983, and the same was dismissed by this Court. Aggrieved by the same, management carried the matter in appeal bearing W.A.No.389 of 1985, which was also dismissed by this Court on 30.4.1985. In view of the same, the management has framed false charges against him and conducted a farce of enquiry and terminated from service on 12.9.1987. Aggrieved by the same, first respondentworkman raised a dispute under Section 2A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 before the first respondentLabour Court in I.D.No.287 of 1990. It was the case of the workman that the enquiry was not properly conducted and no opportunity was given to him and the punishment of dismissal from service was disproportionate to that of the misconduct alleged against him.
