The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that the writ petition became infructuous based on the learned counsel's submission and dismissed the petition without orders on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.9397 of 2002
Dated: July 5, 2006
Between:
P. Naganna, S/o. P. Naganna, aged about 35 years, Occ: Advocate, R/o.41/563, Upstairs, Kothapeta, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
… Petitioner
And
The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Home (Courts) Secretariat, A.P., Hyderabad, and another.
… Respondents
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter
of the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY.
July 5, 2006 MRR
P. Naganna
The Govt. of A.P.
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
