Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners' counsel was absent on the day of hearing. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No.8531 of 1994
Date: 07.02.2006
Between:
P. Venkataramana & others
.. PETITIONERS
AND
Secretary, Finance & Planning Department, Govt., of A.P., Secretariat Building, Hyderabad & others
.. RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
None appeared for the petitioners on 06-02-2006, and as such, the matter was posted “for dismissal” today. Today also, neither learned counsel for the petitioners is present nor is there any representation on his behalf.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date: 07-02-2006
Prv
P. Venkataramana & others
Secretary, Finance & Planning Department, Govt., of A.P.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
