The above show cause notice was issued to fifth petitioner herein and all other show cause notices to other petitioners are also similar. Be that as it is, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the impugned order is not a show cause notice but it is a decision by the respondents to resume the land assigned to the petitioners in accordance with Laoni Rules, 1950 made in G.O.Ms.No.1406, dated 26.07.1958 read with G.O.Ms.No.1724, dated 26.08.1959 and if such resumption is not stopped at the threshold, the same would imminently deprive the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. The learned senior counsel would add that when the impingement of fundamental rights looms large, the Court of judicial review must accept the petition and adjudicate the matter. He placed reliance on Laoni Rules and A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317F and also refers to condition 12 of the final patta certificate issued to the petitioners. Per contra, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) opposes the writ petition contending that at the stage of show cause notice, the petition for judicial review would not lie.
