The petitioner is allegedly owner of House No.5-4-40 and 5-4-40/1, J.N.Road, Abids, Hyderabad. He states that he was in possession of the house since 1998 and by reason of a document executed in 2004 by the owner of the house, he became absolute owner. It appears there is an electrical transformer near his house allegedly causing inconvenience. In paragraph 3 of the affidavit accompanying the writ petition, he also alleges that his grandson died of electrocution. Perhaps, for this reason, he approached the respondents to shift the transfer as there is imminent threat to his family members. Initially, he filed W.P.No.9706 of 2006 seeking a direction to respondents to remove the electrical transformer alleging that it is situated in his premises. By an order, dated 09.05.2006, this Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation, dated 27.06.2005 made by the petitioner within a period of three weeks. The petitioner then filed contempt case being C.C.No.640 of 2006 alleging that the order passed by this Court has not been obeyed. At that stage, respondents produced a copy of the order, dated 27.05.2006 pleading sufficient compliance to the Mandamus issued by the Court. When the contempt case was heard, a copy of the letter, dated 27.05.2006 was also served on the counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, challenging the same, the present writ petition is filed again seeking invalidation of the said communication sent by the second respondent and for a further direction to respondents to shift the transformer from the petitioner’s premises.
